(EXTRACT of case law)
Labels
Accounting Standards
article
BLANK FORMS
budget 2009-10
Budget Proposals
CA members
CA STUDENT
CA STUDENTS
Case Laws
Companies Act
Company Secretary
Cost Accounting standards
EVENTS (CA nd students)
Exchange rates (import and exports)
FBT
Free downloads-calc nd many more
GST
HUF
ICWAI Members
IFRS
Income Tax
Knowledge Centre (CA and CS students)
letters
LLP
MICR codes of banks
MVAT
NEWS
Professional tax
RBI circular
Revision Test Papers
SEBI Laws
Service tax
SITE MAP
SOX
State budget
Suggested answers
TDS
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Jacobs Engineering vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Even “foreseeable losses” are allowable as deduction
Even “foreseeable losses” are allowable as deduction The assessee was engaged in the business of executing works contracts and was following the mercantile system of accounting and the “percentage completion method”. It claimed a deduction for “foreseeable losses” on incomplete projects which was disallowed by the AO and CIT (A) on the basis that it was merely an anticipated loss based on an estimate. It was also held that as a major part of the work was not completed, the losses could not be properly anticipated. On appeal by the assessee, HELD, allowing the appeal: (i) Para 13.1 of Accounting Standard 7 (AS-7) mandates that a foreseeable loss on the entire contract should be provided for in the financial statements irrespective of the amount of work done and the method of accounting followed; (ii) The fact that AS-7 has not been notified by the Central Government as an accounting standard for purposes of s. 145 (2) is not relevant; (iii) In principle, anticipated losses on incomplete projects are allowable as a deduction subject to their being calculated as per AS-7
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment