This is mine google SMS channel through this you will receive direct updates in mobile
Labels
Accounting Standards
BLANK FORMS
Budget Proposals
CA STUDENT
CA STUDENTS
CA members
Case Laws
Companies Act
Company Secretary
Cost Accounting standards
EVENTS (CA nd students)
Exchange rates (import and exports)
FBT
Free downloads-calc nd many more
GST
HUF
ICWAI Members
IFRS
Income Tax
Knowledge Centre (CA and CS students)
LLP
MICR codes of banks
MVAT
NEWS
Professional tax
RBI circular
Revision Test Papers
SEBI Laws
SITE MAP
SOX
Service tax
State budget
Suggested answers
TDS
article
budget 2009-10
letters
Saturday, July 11, 2009
T.A. Quereshi v CIT (SC) [2006 (287) ITR 547] (06/12/2006)
Income Tax Act, s. 254 (2), 37 – Held, the High Court has adopted an emotional and moralapproach rather than a legal approach - Law is different from morality - The explanationto s. 37 has really nothing to do with the present case as it is not a case of a businessexpenditure, but of business loss - Once it is found that the heroin seized formed part ofthe stock in trade of the assessee, it follows that the seizure and confiscation of suchstock in trade has to be allowed as a business loss - Impugned judgment of the High Court Income Tax Act, s. 254 (2), 37 – Held, the High Court has adopted an emotional and moral approach rather than a legal approach - Law is different from morality - The explanationto s. 37 has really nothing to do with the present case as it is not a case of a businessexpenditure, but of business loss - Once it is found that the heroin seized formed part ofthe stock in trade of the assessee, it follows that the seizure and confiscation of suchstock in trade has to be allowed as a businessloss - Impugned judgment of the High Court
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment